opinion | Readers slam The Post: Iga Swiatek’s French Open win deserves more attention

Placeholder whereas loading article actions

Every week, The Submit runs a batch of reader complaints letters – noting grammatical errors, lacking protection, and inconsistencies. These messages inform us what we have performed fallacious and, at occasions, reward us. Right here, we’re providing free messaging to everybody for this week.

Concerning the June 5 sports activities articleSwiatek simply sends Gauff into the ultimate“:

I do not know Billie Jean King, however I really feel relieved that she’s going to share my disappointment with the size of actual property on the entrance web page within the sports activities part of this 12 months’s French Open Girls’s Iga Sweetek, on June 5. The picture and textual content on the again web page deserved to be within the foreground greater than what was printed.

Right here we have now our heroine who performed an excellent match in opposition to Coco Gauff (an excellent participant in her personal proper), received her second Roland Garros title, retained her standing because the No. 1 participant on this planet, and continued her match profitable streak. to 35.

I am simply not clear how her achievement in a serious sport will get much less consideration than Standpoint For somebody who hasn’t received something noticeable in ages.

Please, we’re presupposed to make progress in the direction of equality on this planet of sport, amongst different issues.

Laurie LiebermanAnd the Alexandria

There are Republicans within the capital too

The Washington Submit’s doctrine, “Democracy dies at the hours of darkness,” doesn’t seem to use to its protection of political campaigns for elected workplace or endorsement of candidates within the District of Columbia.

Within the Might 15 openingMayor of the capital metropolis“Chairmen of Mayor Muriel E. Bowser urged to “re-elect her for a 3rd time period.” Endorsement of D.C. Delegate to the U.S. Home of Representatives [“For D.C. delegate,” editorial, May 23] “We urge voters to carry Mrs. Norton again into the Home,” she mentioned.

Generally, the Democratic Social gathering’s main endorsement has referred to as for incumbents to be “reelected.” Does this imply that the editorial board is intent on ignoring the truth that the Republican Social gathering in DC has candidates in search of nominations for mayor, delegate, council president, common council member, and different workplaces? Subsequent editorials ought to inform voters that these endorsements are for the Democratic Social gathering’s nominations and that the winners will face Republican candidates in November.

Nelson RimmensnaiderAnd the Washington

The author is a Republican candidate for the place of Washington’s delegate to the US Home of Representatives.

Is it a republic or a democracy? sure!

In response to the June 4 message Free for all “Republic, if KidsPost can preserveI need to ask how the author defines his phrases. He says we stay in a non-democratic republic. What definition of democracy does he use? “Direct democracy” signifies that residents vote instantly on each legislation? No nation on this planet has such a system. Or consultant democracy, which signifies that voters instantly elect representatives who make choices for them (which we clearly have at this time)?

It’s true that the framers of the structure linked the phrase “democracy” to mob rule. However it’s also true that by “republic” they imply a constitutional consultant democracy – that’s, a constitutional system that features oblique majority rule, with limits on authorities energy and safety of minority rights. So when individuals assert that we stay in a republic, not a democracy, it’s a contradiction in phrases, as a result of the republic they created was then, much more at this time than it was in 1787, a type of democracy.

If the query is “Will we stay in a republic or a democracy?” , the reply is “each”.

Though I very a lot disagree with George F. Will, I’m an avid reader of his article.

Nevertheless, I used to be disillusioned that his Might twenty ninth article “Biden’s presidential scorecard in 500 days“comprises a notable, and apparently willful, omission. In an try to say that federal laws referring to elections to Congress could be, in his phrases, a “federal expropriation from the states of the constitutional accountability to conduct the elections,” citing Article 1, Part 4 of the Structure, which It offers the state legislatures energy to prescribe “the occasions, locations, and method of conducting elections for senators and representatives.”

Will’s quote ended there. However the the rest of Part 4 reads, “However Congress could at any time by legislation make or amend such bylaws, besides with respect to locations for number of Senators.”

Will is best than that.

Charles W. blahAnd the silver spring

D-Day isn’t just one other day

I regarded in useless on the June 6 challenge of The Submit to see one thing to commemorate D-Day, which occurred 78 years in the past. No luck! It appears as if D-Day is fading into oblivion. We had a whole lot of casualties that day, and it was a really costly victory, one which shouldn’t be forgotten. Let’s do higher on the 79th Anniversary!

The author is a veteran of World Warfare II.

In his assessment of Jeff Nussbaum’s Undelivered: The By no means Heard Letters That Would Rewrite Historical past, historian Douglas Brinkley referred to the letter ready by Basic Dwight Eisenhower within the occasion the Normandy landings failed in 1944—or, Brinkley penned it, if The invasion turns right into a Dunkirk episode [“In undelivered speeches, history’s alternate paths,” Outlook, June 5].

However the well-known Battle of Dunkirk was the antithesis of the failed invasion. The profitable evacuation of British troops from France was in 1940. The phrase “boondoggle” means, based on Merriam-Webster, “a mission or wasteful or impractical exercise typically involving graft.” If the Normandy invasion had failed and Hitler had saved his maintain on Western Europe, this could have been a catastrophe or a tragedy, maybe, however it’s actually not impenetrable.

Paul BodroAnd the Tacoma Park

I do know the insurance policies round reporting individuals’s ages in information articles and photographs have possible modified lately, however trying on the captions on entrance web page photographs on Might 31, I am having bother understanding The Submit’s insurance policies. The caption for the highest picture, of three girls in a flower store in Ovaldi, Texas, included the ages of all three girls. Since all three girls are clearly adults, their precise ages don’t appear to be very related within the image. The caption for the second picture on the entrance web page of two males in Buffalo, UT, didn’t embody the lads’s ages.

What’s the message right here? Why is it essential to publish the ages of girls and never males? The Washington Submit’s insurance policies seem like inconsistent at finest, and sexist at worst.

Carol RadomskyAnd the silver spring

A Crucial Distinction When It Involves “Precise Hate”

June 3 fashion article coping with the end result of Johnny Depp’s defamation lawsuit in opposition to Amber Heard [“Why Depp won in U.S. but not in U.K.”] Inaccurately described the American authorized normal of the supremacy of a public determine in a libel swimsuit.

The article acknowledged that to satisfy the criterion of “precise malice” (adopted by the Supreme Courtroom in a 1964 resolution New York Occasions v. Sullivan), the plaintiff should show that the defendant knew that “the defamatory assertion was unfaithful when it was made.” This erred within the check set by the Supreme Courtroom, which states {that a} plaintiff could recuperate whether or not the defendant (1) knew the assertion was false, or (2) acted with reckless disregard for whether or not the assertion was true. It is a vital distinction, with vital implications. For instance, if a media entity spreads a lie with out doing due diligence to find out the reality of the assertion, it may be legally uncovered beneath the usual of precise malice.

John S. Ross IIIAnd the Holden, Mass.

The author is a constitutional legislation instructor at Assumption College.

Getting the fallacious concept about lecturers and summer season trip

I get the which means of Joe Heller on June 7 editorial graphics It was related to the insane battlefields the faculties was – figuratively and actually, sadly. Nevertheless, I need to object to the misunderstanding many individuals have: lecturers and summer season trip!

To start with, I do not know of any public faculty system (and I’ve by no means heard of a personal faculty both) that provides lecturers a 3 month break (in contrast to some faculties). Right here in Montgomery County, it takes eight weeks at most, not 12. And theOpposite to individuals’s greatest misunderstanding, lecturers are out of labor throughout these eight weeks. And theSince lecturers are contract staff, they can not acquire unemployment (in contrast to auto staff who’ve been historically “laid off” whereas retooling meeting strains to provide a brand new mannequin).

Actually, I actually favored the animation and thought it was very acceptable and related. I want Heller had written “two months” as a substitute of “three” months.

Leslie BackusAnd the silver spring

The author is a retired science instructor.

This ‘comic’ ought to have gotten the hook

Sorry, however I did not discover something humorous about how tough it’s for a lot of amputees to dress, Might 31 subject”Rhymes with orangeComedy tape. I discovered the tape notably tasteless the day after Memorial Day, after we honor those that have fallen in battle.

William B. WinterAnd the silver spring

Expelling a reporter could result in concern of talking out

Concerning the June 10 fashion article “Postal reporter who criticized the newspaper on-line has been fired“:

As a subscriber, I’m aggravated by the dismissal of Felicia Sonmez. For my part, her dismissal has broken The Submit’s status greater than any public feedback Sonmez has made. It is irritating that The Submit has fired her. I discover it’s extra possible that different staff have skilled the problems you raised, and firing them will result in a tradition of concern reasonably than a spirit of fellowship. The Submit’s staff could also be much less more likely to communicate out about injustice within the newspaper, and good, trustworthy reporting is extra more likely to endure. I worth experiences by individuals with the ability to show the errors of the highly effective, and I admire management that listens to the opposition reasonably than crushes it. Please display the power of character wanted to run a first-class newspaper and make use of its again.

Emily SeveranceAnd the Peña Blanca, New Mexico

There should be some excellent news, proper?

It’s encouraging that there are far fewer occasions that we have now to see the title and picture of a former president on web page after web page of The Submit. Nevertheless, the very destructive and unhappy parts within the information today have elevated with 4 destructive articles about President Biden within the first 4 pages of the June 5 challenge. Then there was Michael de Adair’s editorial cartoon About Biden’s lack of political capital. Is there nothing that may very well be optimistic and inspiring about this president? I discover that tough to imagine.

Marcia HojstraAnd the Washington

Thanks for not alerting us to this spoiler

Concerning e-book assessment on June fifth”The cinematic story of a French baron kidnapped with a severed finger” [Outlook]:

Jonathan Kirsch, who reviewed the true crime thriller “The Final Baron: The Paris Kidnapping that introduced down an empire” by Tom Sancton, did a wonderful job of telling the story of the 1978 kidnapping of Baron Edward Jean Empain with out letting the reader know the way the sufferer finally succeeded. Actually, Kirsch ended his assessment by writing, “Above all else, it is a completely genuine thriller. For that reason, and out of respect for the writer and his readers, the conclusion can’t be revealed right here.” Sadly, the assessment was accompanied by a photograph of Empain arriving at a hospital in Paris after, after kidnapping. Effectively, I believe he survived his ordeal. Thanks for spoiling the ending.

Sarah DownsAnd the Woodway, Tex.

We’ve greater than sufficient

Cease the atrocities of the college taking pictures and declare that ‘that’s sufficient,’ as acknowledged within the Might 31 letter to the editorWhy is america completely different?“Sufficient” signifies that some have been unwell, even sick. The varsity shootings or different atrocities have been by no means “sufficient”.

George HoskinAnd the Burtonsville

Some clarifications on the definition of “mass taking pictures”.

Within the June 5 version of The Submit, Glenn Kessler wrote that there have been 4 mass shootings this 12 months, primarily based on the definition included in Kessler’s fact-checker column, “What analysis reveals concerning the effectiveness of gun management legal guidelines for a mass ceasefire. On the editorial web page, The Submit has indicated that there have been greater than 232 mass shootings in 2022 up to now [“Our hands aren’t tied”]. I perceive that the definition of “mass taking pictures” varies relying on the group accumulating the info, however this discrepancy appears unreasonably giant and contradictory. The very fact-checker famous that there are not less than eight databases that observe mass shootings. Can the newspaper clarify to readers what the numbers are, who collects the info, the completely different definitions, and so on.? And thanks for overlaying this vital challenge.